Do consumer voices in health-care citizens’ juries matter?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Do consumer voices in health‐care citizens’ juries matter?
BACKGROUND There is widespread agreement that the public should be engaged in health-care decision making. One method of engagement that is gaining prominence is the citizens' jury, which places citizens at the centre of the deliberative process. However, little is known about how the jury process works in a health-care context. There is even less clarity about how consumer perspectives are hea...
متن کاملCitizens' juries: an aid to environmental valuation?
Survey techniques such as contingent valuation have been used extensively by environmental economists to develop an understanding of consumer preferences for environmental goods. On the basis of such techniques, recommendations have been formulated in relation to environmental policy. However, the exposure of weaknesses in this method has led economists to look to other informationgathering app...
متن کاملResearch priorities in urinary incontinence: results from citizens' juries.
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to elicit research ideas, priorities and outcome measures from women who suffer from urinary incontinence. DESIGN Citizens' juries gather participants together for a combination of education and deliberation on a specific topic. The juries were held in November 2007. SETTING Women living in the community with urinary incontinence. SAMPLE Purposive...
متن کاملInfluencing health policy through public deliberation: Lessons learned from two decades of Citizens'/community juries.
Citizens'/community juries [CJs] engage members of the public in policy decision-making processes. CJs can be employed to develop policy responses to health problems that require the consideration of both community values and scientific evidence. Based on the principles of deliberative democracy, recent reviews indicate that findings from CJs have successfully been used to influence health poli...
متن کاملChoices without reasons: citizens' juries and policy evaluation.
Citizens' juries are commended as a new technique for democratising health service reviews. Their usefulness is said to derive from a reliance on citizens' rational deliberation rather than on the immediate preferences of the consumer. The author questions the assertion of critical detachment and asks whether juries do in fact employ reason as a means of resolving fundamental disagreements abou...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Health Expectations
سال: 2015
ISSN: 1369-6513
DOI: 10.1111/hex.12397